end of a good week!

Posted June 20, 2008 by gregnz
Categories: Uncategorized

its been a great getstaffed week. Andrew and I have had a big think about where we need to be going, and what we are planning to do, which was really good. We also had some external feedback from some people who we know, but arent affiliated (yet!) with getstaffed. And these people are high up in the companies that getstaffed is targetting. And their feedback was pretty positive all up, some good thoughts and things we could be doing, but very positive. And some indication that getstaffed is getting pretty well known in the industry.

And, we had some more jobs and a placement with one of our big bank members,  which is great. I think the best thing for Andrew and I is… all the feedback we get, from contractors and businesses, is… “Great concept, its about time!”. Contractors obviously complain a bit that we don’t have enough jobs. We do try, but the reality is, most of our placements are by companies searching, rather than posting job ads.

We’ve still got a long way to go to change the industry, and put large chunks of money back into the businesses that hire contractors, and the contractors themselves. But we’ve made a start!

$65K? Who cares?

Posted May 28, 2008 by gregnz
Categories: Uncategorized

it must be election year. The national party are jumping all over the labour party for a 65K splurge on a conference for the Housing Dept.

$65K? Sounds like a lot right?

But lets look at it. A single large government department, with 100 contractors with a recruitment margin of $15/hr (the minimum rate for one of the big recruitment agents, so I’m underestimating), costs that department $60,000 a week. The getstaffed charge would be $12000, so the excess is $48,000.

So about $50K per week. For a single government department. A week. So maybe $65,000 for a 2 day retreat is not quite as important as the national party would want you to believe…?

Time for a may update!

Posted May 18, 2008 by gregnz
Categories: Contracting, Start-up, getstaffed.com

I’ve been a bit slack on the blog postings, sorry! Lots of other stuff to do, and I just seem to drop the ball sometimes, like an all black in a world cup quarter final.

getstaffed is building up steam, we have some new companies on board, and we are getting a much clearer picture of what motivates those companies. Some are cost driven, which means they use seek a lot, whereas others are not so motivated by cost, so they utilise recruiters a lot.

So now we are just working out how to pitch things correctly, to let these guys know the value of getstaffed. We have both our member and business side to keep happy, and one won’t grow without the other. And vice versa. Like a super chicken/egg story, not quite sure which is which! We also need to let our members know that a lot of our companies don’t post jobs, but prefer to search and contact directly. And, we need to do it in such a way that people don’t get pissed with our communications and start flagging us as spam!

In any case, we’re definitely trying to make things better/easier/faster. We are looking at raising some cash to be a bit more aggressive in growth terms in NZ. So we will let you know how that goes. Shes a hard road, finding the perfect business plan/execution strategy/etc!

:-)

as always, let us know if you love us/hate us/have suggestions/have criticisms/just want to chat about the market/have a nice cookie recipe!

Is Recruitment Lucrative?

Posted April 17, 2008 by Andrew Kissling
Categories: Recruitment

Just has lunch with a good friend who is in recruitment. We chatted about the industry and the subject of salary and remuneration structures came up. Pretty normal stuff – base salaries, commissions performance bonuses.

 

The bit that had my eyes watering was the story of three recruiters who recently left my friend’s business to start their own recruitment agency. Their salaries were all upwards of $1.5m per year. Presumably they thought they could do better be going out on their own !!

 

I’m sure most people in the recruitment industry would have some claim to their adding value to their clients’ businesses, but the salaries here put these recruiters in the slave trade industry in my view.

 

So what’s the verdict?  Do recruitment agencies add enough value to have employees paid millions?  You can guess what I think!

 

 

jobs drought…

Posted April 15, 2008 by gregnz
Categories: Uncategorized

the contract market seems a little slow right now, and Andrew and I were coming up with strategies to deal with these inevitable downturns.

Our problem, or situation rather, is that there will be times when we don’t have many jobs. Its the nature of the business, and indicative that we have lots more to do to raise getstaffeds profile in the market, and convince some… more conservative… organisations that we are legit, and actually the best way to find people.

Of course, we compared ourselves to the situations on seek, or any of the recruitment agents. Our thing is, we only advertise real jobs. Jobs that have been posted by real companies, for a real position that they have a real need to fill.

All real. But how many times have you responded to an ad on seek and “the position has been filled”, or “that project is delayed (or cancelled)”, or “registrations of interest in an upcoming (nonexistent) project”. And how many times have you responded to several ads, only to find out that theres only one position?

All this happens all the time. We all know it, and seek loves it! More ads, more money. Recruiters get to capture cvs, in case something comes up, and it looks good.

We need lots of members too, we’re up front about that. But… all our job ads are real. Really real. When you respond to an ad, you don’t respond to Andrew or I. You respond directly to the company.

And if we don’t have job ads… we will tell you. Straight up. Everything on getstaffed.com is real. And we commit to keeping it that way.

change is good

Posted April 13, 2008 by gregnz
Categories: Contracting, Recruitment Agent, Start-up

as we have progressed through getstaffed, from its initial conception through various iterations and discussions, we’ve realised that getstaffed is an industry changer.

When we first started, we were thinking “it’d be great to offer a good alternative to recruitment agents”, and our goals were pretty modest. Some people using us, organic growth, make the world a better place.

As we have lived the getstaffed life, our thinking has become a bit more… not aggressive, but maybe we just have a lot more belief. Getstaffed is an industry changer. Sounds kinda pushy, but everything about getstaffed is not repeatable by traditional recruiters. We make our model open. Everyone knows our margins ($3/hr for a contractor, and we’re looking at $2000 for a permanent placement). Members have access to their data, and can use their testimonials elsewhere. There are no secrets.

We want to be the preferred supplier of choice, simply because we offer an unbeatable model. not because we somehow managed to get a piece of paper signed. We want IT people to come to us, because we offer stackloads of getstaffed points and they love flying around the place.

We think we have an unbeatable model for business. And IT people. Our challenge right now is to get everyone knowing about it, and using it. And thats our focus now.

getstaffed april update

Posted April 7, 2008 by gregnz
Categories: Uncategorized

well, quite a few new things happening with getstaffed. more site changes keeping me busy, a lot of stuff on the managers side as we get more feedback from them, which is great.

also, some cool stuff on the contractor side of things, number one being… my cool new front page! well. ok, maybe that might be number 2, since my graphic design skills are a bit rubbish. But I did manage to get the PDF contractor profile going, which is nice. Basically, members are getting all these cool testimonials, and want to show them to companies who haven’t come to the getstaffed family (family… we sound like the mafia. cool!)

so, theres a new link in the profile page (email my profile to me (so I can send it to non-getstaffed companies) which will get you a nifty pdf of the getstaffed profile page, with all your testimonials and the skills matrix.

we hope its useful, its a good way of getting the getstaffed name to far distant places where people havent heard of us. I KNOW! who hasnt heard of us? Inconceivable! Like always, let us know what you think at support@getstaffed.com

challenges of the revolution…

Posted March 21, 2008 by gregnz
Categories: Uncategorized

getstaffed is about changing how we find work. Its changing the whole landscape of IT recruitment, by allowing businesses and contractors to get in touch directly. getstaffed facilitates this, by having all the CV, testimonial, searching etc, but ultimately, its up to the contractor and the business to reach agreement.

We don’t try and get in the way, we just try and help. But there are a lot of challenges, changing an industry. Particularly keeping both our contractors and our businesses engaged. We have a couple of businesses now who appear to make getstaffed their first stop, because they have had success recruiting through us. Others… well, aren’t so involved.

Andrew and I are starting a big push over the next month or so to increase the level of engagement from particularly our business customers. ie, explaining exactly what getstaffed is, how it works, and why its the best! We are also restarting our business expansion plans, recruiting more businesses to the site. Our goal is to have 5 or so active contracts* per week, so check back and let us know how we are doing!

*That would be “getstaffed Real contracts”, not the “register your interest, we have HEAPS of (non-existent) contracts for MAJOR companies (who havent actually agreed to anything)” jobs on seek. Repeated by 10 recruitment agents. Our jobs really exist.

Are the MSM stuck in the dark ages?

Posted March 12, 2008 by Andrew Kissling
Categories: Media, Start-up

I’ve sat on this post for a while. Um’ing and Ah’ing about posting or not. But no more. So here goes …

One of the really critical thing about starting a business is getting the right exposure. Traditionally it’s been MSM (the mainstream media) who have been courted because of their reach. The getstaffed story is a pretty compelling one: a fresh new business looks to use intelligent web technologies to disintermediate recruitment agencies who are seen by many (most?) of their customers as costly and offering indifferent service. Shhhhh – if you listen carefully, you can hear the howls of protest of recruitment agency owners as they dispatch another Dom Perignon.

So we approached a major NZ newspaper. A reporter took the bait, got back to me and asked for a 30min chat. The chat turned into 60+ minutes an ended with the reporter co-ordinating a time for the [now award winning] photographer to take some snaps of Greg and I. This duly happened, and 100’s of photos later  the photo shoot was done. Presumably it took so long because one or both of us have a facial elegance of the side of a quarry :)

And then we waited. And waited.

Some time later I contacted the reporter who I genuinely believe was furious… towards their editor. Apparently a story about a Recruitment 2.0 start-up could offend the papers large recruitment agency advertisers. Horrors…

So there you have it. We have a great story – well 500+ contractors and 29 businesses and everyone else we speak to thinks so, a reporter has researched and written a story, there are photo’s ready to roll .. and the editor of a major daily newspaper won’t publish the story out of a fear that their advertising revenue would be impacted. Perhaps that fear is evidence of a bright future for getstaffed.com. I want to make it so.

HR = Hardly Relevant ?

Posted March 9, 2008 by Andrew Kissling
Categories: Trends

Leon Benjamin has an interesting post about Recruitment 2.0. Worth a read. Meantime, a few extracts …

Whilst there are a number of existing players exploring the opportunities, much of the innovation will come from start ups.  They take a more open approach and focus on reliably matching supply and demand and recognise that the key function to get right is to make search preposterously easy for every user

That’s us :)

The current crop of IT job boards have a limited lifespan in their current form because they don’t allow candidates to expose other dimensions of their personality, peer reputation and soft skills that clients desperately seek to improve their talent acquisition capabilities, that is; to massively reduce the risk of getting it wrong. 

Completely agree. What’s the point of simply replacing printed ads with online ads … when the industry’s underlying business model is going the way of the Dodo.